
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
A milestone for Artemis II: Astronauts enter the 'lunar sphere of influence' - 2
Lockheed Martin opens new hypersonic weapons facility - 3
Met Gala 2026 will celebrate fashion as an 'embodied art form': A guide to the theme, dress code, cochairs and hosting committee of the starry event - 4
Israeli police block Latin Patriarch from Palm Sunday mass in Jerusalem - 5
Cocaine, caffeine, painkillers consumed by sharks in Bahamas, study finds
'Wicked: For Good' was filmed at this surreal National Park in Egypt
'Backward and upward and tilted': Spaceflight causes astronauts' brains to shift inside their skulls
Ford Is Using a Chinese-Built Van to Fight Europe’s EV Price War
World's oldest known tortoise still very much alive despite rumor to the contrary
Surveys of Thrillers That Re-imagined the Class
What causes RFK Jr.’s strained and shaky voice? A neurologist explains this little-known disorder
'Harmonious' meeting between Merz, Lula despite Belém controversy
Find the Insider facts of Compelling Systems administration: Building Associations for Progress
Israel says it will keep control over part of southern Lebanon after war with Hezbollah ends













